Product Description
TYPES OF PLATE(Customized options)
1:Single-material panel
2:Alumina composite panel
3:Silicon carbide composite panel
4:Boron carbide composite panel
COMPOSITE PROCESS(Customized options)
1:Conventional composite process
The conventional composite process is mainly designed for mosaic small pieces that are pieced together, as well as for inserts where the ceramic curvature closely matches the curvature of the backboard.
2:Hot press bonding process
Thermal pressing bonding mainly involves the bonding of the entire plate ceramic and the back plate. Through the method of adding temperature and pressure in a vacuum hot press tank, the ceramic and the back plate are made to fit perfectly, achieving the best protect
performance.
MATERIAL(Customized options)
1:Single-material insert plate:Aramid, PE
2:Aluminum oxide insert plate: PART 1:Alumina small pieces (rectangular, hexagonal) PART 2:Back panel (aramid, PE) PART 3:Adhesive
3:Silicon carbide insert plate:PART 1:Silicon carbide small pieces (rectangular, hexagonal), silicon carbide whole plates. PART 2:Back panel (aramid, PE) PART 3: Adhesive
4:Boron carbide insert plate: PART 1: Boron carbide small pieces (rectangular, hexagonal), boron carbide whole plates PART 2:Back panel (aramid, PE) PART 3:Adhesive
NIJ PROTECT LEVEL
| NIJ 0101.06 Classification of ability levels |
| |
Table 2 NIJ 0101.06 protection rating |
| Protect level |
Type of test projectile |
WEIGHT OF THE PROJECTILE/ g |
Speed/(m · s-¹) |
range/
m |
Number of shots per target plate |
Maximum depth of the indentation on the back surface / m m |
Initial kinetic energy/J |
| Environmental adaptability experiment |
Testing experiment |
0° |
30° |
45° |
Environmental adaptability experiment |
Board insertion test experiment |
| IIA |
9×19mm FMJ*1 RN SC |
8.0 |
355±9.1 |
373±9.1 |
5±1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
504 |
557 |
| .40 S&W FMJ*1 FN SC |
11.7 |
325±9.1 |
352±9.1 |
5±1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
618 |
725 |
| II |
9×19mm FMJ*1 RN SC |
8.0 |
379±9.1 |
398±9.1 |
5±1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
575 |
634 |
| .357 Magnum JSP SC |
10.2 |
408±9.1 |
436±9.1 |
5±1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
849 |
969 |
| |
.357 SIG FMJ*1 FN SC |
8.1 |
430±9.1 |
448±9.1 |
5±1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
749 |
812 |
| IIIA |
.44 Magnum SJHP SC |
15.6 |
408±9.1 |
436±9.1 |
5±1 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
44 |
1298 |
1483 |
| III |
7.62×51 mm M80 FMJ PB SC |
9.6 |
847±9.1 |
|
15±1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
3444 |
|
| IV |
7.62×63mm
.30-06 M2 AP FMJ*1 PB HC |
10.8 |
878±9.1 |
|
15±1 |
1~6 |
0 |
0 |
44 |
4163 |
|
| NIJ 0101.07 Standard classification of protective capabilities |
| NIJ0101.07 protection rating |
| Protect level |
Type of test projectile |
NOMINAL WEIGHT OF THE PROJECTILE / g |
Speed /
(m · s-¹) |
Range/m |
Number of shots per target plate |
Initial kinetic energy/J |
| 0° |
30° |
45° |
| HG1 |
9×19mm FMJ*1 RN SC |
8.0 |
398 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
634 |
| .357 Magnum JSP SC |
10.2 |
436 |
969 |
| HG2 |
9×19mm FMJ*1 RN SC |
8.0 |
448 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
803 |
| .44 Magnum JHP SC |
15.6 |
436 |
1483 |
| RF1 |
7.62×51mm M80 FMJ PB SC |
9.6 |
847 |
|
|
|
|
3444 |
| 7.62×39mm M43 FMJ PB MSC |
7.81 |
725 |
15 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
2053 |
| 5.56×45mm M193 FMJ*1 PB SC |
3.6 |
990 |
|
|
|
|
1764 |
| RF2 |
7.62×51(mm M80 FMJ PB SC |
9.6 |
847 |
|
|
|
|
3444 |
| 7.62×39mm M43 FMJ PB MSC |
7.81 |
725 |
15 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
2053 |
| 5.56×45 mm M193 FMJ*1 PB SC |
3.6 |
990 |
1764 |
| 5.56×45mm M855/SS109 FMJ*1 PB SCP |
4.0 |
950 |
|
|
|
|
1805 |
| RF3 |
7.62×63mm.30+6 M2 AP FMJ*1 PB HC |
10.7 |
878 |
15 |
1~6 |
0 |
0 |
4124 |
The NIJ0101.07 standard has eliminated the difference in bullet velocity and adopted all high velocities. Additionally, the IIA level as stipulated in the NIJ0101.06 standard has been removed. Compared with the NIJ0101.06 standard, the new standard has expanded the types of test projectiles. The RF1 level of protection requires conducting shooting experiments with M80, M43, and M193 projectiles to test the defense. The three types of projectiles include both full-power high-kinetic-energy projectiles and high-penetration projectiles. The requirements for the protection level must be able to resist full-power projectiles as well as intermediate-power and high-penetration projectiles, indicating that the standards are becoming increasingly strict in terms of the requirements for the performance of protective materials.
The RF2 level protection adds the SS109 projectile test on the basis of the RF1 level. This projectile has the same size as the M193 projectile, but its internal structure and core material are different. The SS109 is a lead-bottomed steel-tipped projectile, and its penetration ability is superior to the M193.
Both the new and old standards require the highest protection level to be able to resist the penetration of the .30-06 M2 full-metal copper armor tip projectile. The core material is a hard steel core with a hardness of 785HV. In addition, the target test results require that there be no visible penetrating cracks at the crater area, and the maximum depression depth of the back scar should be ≤ 44mm.
Company Profile
Certifications
Packaging & Shipping
FAQ
Audited Supplier 
){kind=link}